.. _MecaSequentialGappyBiaisMetaModel2: MecaSequentialGappyBiaisMetaModel2 ================================== This use case aims to validate the methodology POD + ECM for quasistatic elastoviscoplastic computations with Z-set, with a reconstruction of the dual quantities using a meta model, see Section :ref:`Publications`, articles 1 and 8. Optional prerequisite: Zmat. The data needed to execute the tutorials below can be loaded here: :download:`exampleMecaSequentialGappyBiaisMetaModel2.zip ` Features: replace the gappy-POD with a custom meta-model and correct the bias ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- The setting is very similar to tutorial :ref:`MecaSequentialGappyBiaisMetaModel`. We simply explain here how to specify a particular meta-model for the dual quantity reconstructor, instead of using the default one. This applies to methods without learning the errors between the HFM and the ROM, see tutorial :ref:`MecaSequentialGappyMetaModel`. .. code-block:: python from Mordicus.BasicAlgorithms import ScikitLearnRegressor as SLR from sklearn.gaussian_process.kernels import WhiteKernel, ConstantKernel, Matern kernel = Matern(length_scale=1., nu=2.5) + ConstantKernel(constant_value=1.0, constant_value_bounds=(1.e-12, 1.e12)) * \ WhiteKernel(noise_level=1, noise_level_bounds=(1e-12, 1e12)) regressor = SLR.MyGPR(kernel=kernel) paramGrid = {'kernel__k1__length_scale': [1., 2.], 'kernel__k1__nu':[1.5, 2.5], 'kernel__k2__k1__constant_value':[1.], \ 'kernel__k2__k2__noise_level':[1]} dualReconstructionData = Mechanical.LearnDualReconstruction(collectionProblemData, \ dualNames, reducedIntegrationPoints, methodDualReconstruction = "MetaModel", \ timeSequenceForDualReconstruction = timeSequence, \ snapshotsAtReducedIntegrationPoints = onlineDualQuantityAtReducedIntegrationPoints, \ regressor = regressor, paramGrid = paramGrid) The last two attributes of ``dualReconstructionData`` enable to specify any scikit-learn meta-model. Results ------- In :numref:`cube-gappybiasmeta2-res`, the quality of the reduced model is illustrated by comparing it to the high-fidelity reference. .. figure:: res.jpg :name: cube-gappybiasmeta2-res :align: center :width: 75% Illustration of the ROM accuracy on the accumulated plasticity ``p`` (left) HFM, (right) pointwise difference between the ROM and the HFM. We notice that with a more involved meta-model, the accuracy is much better than tutorials :ref:`MecaSequentialGappyMetaModel` and :ref:`MecaSequentialGappyBiaisMetaModel`.